Step 4. Record your findings and implement them. Step 5. Review your assessment and update if necessary. Source: indgpdf. structure with responsibilities pdf. 3 – Risk assessments Email: [email protected] Telephone: Planning 5 Steps to Risk Assessments pdf.
|Published (Last):||13 July 2012|
|PDF File Size:||12.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.34 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dividing the time spent on the risk assessment between several individuals – this approach to risk giv usually means that risks at interfaces between plant, people or processes are missed.
The risk assessment steps allow the generation of a list of risks but for many use it can beg the question ‘where should I focus, what are the biggest risks? This was a multi-agency group to provide advice on public event safety.
These laws, covering work places such as factories, offices, railway premises etc. Using “reasonably practicable” allows HSE to set goals for organisations, rather than ineg163 pre scriptive. The legal responsibilities of employers are summarised in Fig.
The Nimrod aircraft had been in service for over 30 years and had been modified twice.
In addition, only 22 tethers were located after the incident. Consider for example a small manufacturing process where Team A take raw material and prepare it for initial fabrication by Team B. HSE successfully prosecuted all parties, the Pubn, the Contract Company and the Public Park Authority, for failing to protect indg63 health and safety of both workers and the public.
It is important to note that ‘Sanctions include fines, imprisonment and disqualification’. ICL Plastics had a factory in Glasgow where there was an explosion that demolished the building killing 9 workers and injuring a further 33 people. The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. Open in a separate window. Carrying out a risk assessment to attempt to justify a decision that has already been made.
How bad could it be?
The Designer’s risk assessment stated that 40 tethers would be required for the structure distributed around the perimeter but only 22 were used by the Contract Company.
A specific approach in pubna A may be inappropriate in industry B. The group did not have the structural engineering expertise to cover the stability of the structure and did not require evidence from the Designer or the Contract Company that the appropriate load calculations had been undertaken and verified, and that the structure would be appropriately secured to ensure stability.
Once the pipes had been installed, no system was put in place to reassess the safety of the pipes as time elapsed. The latter will bring a ‘fresh pair of eyes’ and often sees risks that those very familiar with the area being assessed overlook due to their over familiarity.
Links to Useful Health and Safety information
The corroded pipe is shown in Fig. Investigation of the historical context indicated that the pipes were installed correctly and to the appropriate standard of the time the pipes were installed in Common Pitfalls of Risk Assessment and How to Improve The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. All three of the parties listed above had a responsibility to ensure the structure was safe but not one of them did so.
Good Practice and Pitfalls in Risk Assessment. The Contract Company did not undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment of the stability of the structure and the likely hazard to members of the public should it become unstable.
Dreamspace was a large inflatable structure inside which members of the public could walk around to experience a dream-like world of light and sound. As with the other case studies, this accident was completely avoidable. Good practice is about making the commitment to ensuring u risks are as low as is reasonably practicable and maintaining that commitment, by risk review and mitigation, throughout the life of the activity being undertaken.
HSE – Publications: Free Leaflets – Risk Assessment
Five Steps to Risk Assessment. The Health and Safety at Work Act places responsibility not only on employers but also on designers, manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that articles and substances are safe for use so far as is reasonably practicable, and on every employee while at work to take reasonable care of him or herself, and of any other person who may yk affected by his or her actions.
Festival of Fireworks Prosecution. Find articles by Karen Russ. The focus of the paper is three recent major UK incidents, all involving fatalities, and all of which ineg163 wholly avoidable if risks had been properly assessed and managed.
This accident was completely avoidable. A suitable and sufficient risk assessment called a Safety Case for large, high hazard plant was not completed following the modifications. This is shown in Fig.