The Googlization of Everything has ratings and 86 reviews. Emma Sea said: Ok, so firstly, thank you Siva Vaidhyanathan for picking a book title that. Available at Siva Vaidhyanathan, The Googlization of Everything ( And Why We Should Worry), Berkeley, CA,. University of California Press, In the beginning, the World Wide Web was exciting and open to the point of anarchy, a vast and intimidating repository of unindexed confusion. Into this creativ.
|Published (Last):||3 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Instead, we should begin by examining what Google actually does and how that compares to what competitors do or might do in the future. As Mao reminds us, while external causes new communication techniques are condition of change, it is the internal causes contradictions between social forces that are ultimately the basis of change, with the external causes becoming operative through the internal causes. But as a concept in knowledge management and discovery, it is potentially revolutionary.
Our enthusiastic embrace of the electronic resources that give us information, communication and community, all at lightning speed and with press-button ease, has changed the world.
As the digital behemoth grows, it’s venturing into increasingly sketchy ethical territory. In Vaidhyanathan’s world all knowledge is equal, and free unfiltered access must be maintained.
Fooglization for “God” from a computer located in West Virginia, he observes, brings up mostly results for “evangelical Protestant Christianity” and a few for atheism, but the first page of results contains nothing whatsoever for Catholicism, Islam, Hinduism or Judaism.
The argumentation was spotty an anecdote about your everythiing journalist friend who defaults to Google Docs does not suffice to show that the company stifles innovative competitors and most chapters failed to coalesce “How Google Came to Rule the Web” explains no such thing. If too many sites infected users’ computers with harmful software, people would gravitate away from the relatively free and open Web into restricted and protected domains, known as “walled gardens” or “gated communities,” that seem less vulnerable to electronic pandemics.
But in making editorial decisions about what is worthwhile, and in now claiming to prefer “high quality sites” over “low quality sites” are they always able to tell which is which? By the summer googlozationCuil delivered consistently good results to basic queries, but no one seemed to notice. If the purpose of a university is taking tuition money in return for gooflization piece of paper that gives the holder a better CV, does that not make a university just a different kind of corporate entity?
The Googlization of Everything: by Siva Vaidhyanathan
Then someone tries to marry a dog, but find it’s illegal, so they start a Google group called “Let me marry my dog!!! Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Various lawsuits have included infringement of copyright law; its dealings with advertising companies and in the volume of advertising that its users encounter. Vaidhyanathan’s reply is that Google is filling too much of a gap, a gap that state institutions should fill.
Google is doing unprecedented things. This is not a topic I read a lot about, so the 4 stars are given because I learned a lot from the text about what Google is and does.
It also claims to be able to conduct rudimentary semantic analysis of the potential results pages to assess relevance better than the popularity method of PageRank. Cuil boasts of searching a larger index of sources than either Google or Microsoft’s search engine, Bing.
The Googlization of Everything: (And Why We Should Worry)
Googlization at Wikipedia’s sister projects. In Vaidhyanathan’s book he suggests that Google has provided a currently positive and helpful search engine for the internet community. Read the book in wrong year!
An urgent reminder to look more closely at kf that lurk in plain sight. The views of those who interrogated the ethical implications of the HGP sat outside of the project.
Because of the way Google presents search results — “a manageable set of choices–just enough to give me a sense of autonomy over my next move but not too many to paralyze me” — it seems to be presenting us with meaning, not just with cold information. You use Gmail, and Google voice, Google docs, and Google search, and eventually you’re filtering a large portion of your digital information and communication needs through one company–A company that is logging your data and selling it to advertisers.
Goolgization valuing everythingg over accuracy and established sites over new ones, Google sets its own agenda regarding what information is most relevant to users, altering their perceptions about value and significance. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. For my job at the Museum of Art, I have even learned a little of wiki html, but I cannot even begin to suggest that Everthing have even a small understanding of the vast workings behind all of the computer programming of internet websites.
Both of these are ‘truth’.
Google had initially offered a censored version of their search engine in China. Googlization googlixation also mean that ever “increasing amounts of accessible information [are] available on the Internet; Google makes it easy and convenient to find in one place”, however, Google only makes information which already exists more accessible, rather than creating new information.
Siva Vaidhyanathan uses Google to examine our capacity for blind faith and to worship innovation as an end in itself.
Do we have to wait for the world to be civilized enough for a Human Knowledge Project to become feasible, or would it only become civilized enough if such a project existed? It examines the rhetoric and assumptions that have supported this proliferation and its unquestioned desire to dominate the internet, economy, society, culture and knowledge googlizaion concerns that should have been in the domain of public debate but have been willingly consigned to the whims of a parochial coterie of technocrats.
Each Web site copied into Google’s servers thus carries with it a set of relative scores instantly calculated to place it in a particular place on a results page, and this ranking is presumed to reflect its relevance to the search query.
In the early days it was easy to assume that the Web, and the Internet of which the Web is a part, was ungoverned and ungovernable. I think this is a book that people should read, because information is power. Google known mostly on their simple to use search engine yet they are one of the largest ad companies in the world.
But by using Google we are not only searching for things on the Internet, we are also giving away markers that allow Google to record information about us. Nov 07, Grace rated it it was ok Shelves: