Software companies which have been involved in a process improvement programme according to ISO/IEC are showing an increasing interest in the . INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Information ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition ISO/IEC exemplar software life cycle Process Assessment.
|Country:||Central African Republic|
|Published (Last):||8 June 2014|
|PDF File Size:||4.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Retrieved from ” https: Views Read Edit View history. There are five general iao industry models in use. Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering.
Each process attribute consists isl one or more generic practices, which are further elaborated into practice indicators to aid assessment performance. The organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step. An organization considering outsourcing software development needs to have a good understanding of the capability of potential suppliers to deliver. Jso specific problem is: This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual assessment. ISO provides a standard for assessing the organization’s capacity to deliver at each of these stages. The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the persons assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate.
Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods.
ISO standards by standard number. There exist several assessment tools.
This was expanded to cover all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. This is an elaboration of the process reference model PRM provided by the process lifecycle standards. List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards. Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor.
Data modeling Enterprise architecture Functional specification Modeling language Orthogonality Programming paradigm Software Software archaeology Software architecture Software configuration management Software development methodology Software development process Software quality Software quality assurance Software verification and validation Structured analysis.
In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made. The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at The international standard defines nine process attributes:.
The 7th part is currently in an advanced Final Draft Standard form  and work has started on part 8. The assessor validates this data to ensure it is accurate and completely covers the assessment scope. January Learn how and when to remove this template message. In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts.
The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models. Following this improvement programme is 1554-5 mandatory and several alternative improvement programmes exist. Process rating requires some exercising of expert judgment on the part of the assessor and this is the reason that there are requirements on assessor qualifications and competency.
Work on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles. SPICE is still used for the user group of the standard, and the title for the annual conference. The actual method is not specified in the standard although the standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method.